tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6890958153006612459.post1857635818371146187..comments2024-03-23T03:23:58.477-07:00Comments on TESTHEAD: Learning Ropes and Making Tradeoffs: A Meandering Walk Through Twenty Years of Software TestingMichael Larsenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/16180074963526979074noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6890958153006612459.post-81481700655460267762012-01-23T13:02:14.505-08:002012-01-23T13:02:14.505-08:00Phil, I answered this in the follow-up post, but a...Phil, I answered this in the follow-up post, but at first, no, while we had testers, we didn't call them that. Testers were specifically hardware focused, and identified as such. As for the rest, read my post about the "10 Year Rocket Ride" :)Michael Larsenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16180074963526979074noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6890958153006612459.post-8229443183121458862012-01-23T03:19:06.087-08:002012-01-23T03:19:06.087-08:00Really enjoying these posts, keep 'em coming.
...Really enjoying these posts, keep 'em coming.<br />Was the test department known as a 'test department' back in those days, were there QA people and test people, how were the test people trained ? was there a them and us divide ?Philhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00281118161548464012noreply@blogger.com